Towards a Knowledge Graph Representing Research Findings by Semantifying Survey Articles

From Openresearch
Revision as of 15:38, 28 June 2018 by Said (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Paper |Title=Towards a Knowledge Graph Representing Research Findings by Semantifying Survey Articles |Authors=Said Fathalla, Sahar Vahdati, Sören Auer, Christoph Lange, |S...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Towards a Knowledge Graph Representing Research Findings by Semantifying Survey Articles
Towards a Knowledge Graph Representing Research Findings by Semantifying Survey Articles
Bibliographical Metadata
Keywords: Semantic Metadata Enrichment, Quality Assessment, Recommendation Services, Scholarly Communication, Semantic Publishing
Year: 2017
Authors: Said Fathalla, Sahar Vahdati, Sören Auer, Christoph Lange
Venue TPDL
Content Metadata
Problem: No data available now.
Approach: No data available now.
Implementation: No data available now.
Evaluation: No data available now.

Abstract

Despite significant advances in technology, the way how research is done and especially communicated has not changed much. We have the vision that ultimately researchers will work on a common knowledge base comprising comprehensive descriptions of their research, thus making research contributions transparent and comparable. The current approach for structuring, systematizing and comparing research results is via survey or review articles. In this article, we describe how surveys for research fields can be represented in a semantic way, resulting in a knowledge graph that describes the individual research problems, approaches, implementations and evaluations in a structured and comparable way. We present a comprehensive ontology for capturing the content of survey articles. We discuss possible applications and present an evaluation of our approach with the retrospective, exemplary semantification of a survey. We demonstrate the utility of the resulting knowledge graph by using it to answer queries about the different research contributions covered by the survey and evaluate how well the query answers serve readers’ information needs, in comparison to having them extract the same information from reading a survey paper.

Conclusion

In this article, we presented SemSur, a Semantic Survey Ontology, and an approach for creating a comprehensive knowledge graph representing research findings. We see this work as an initial step of a long-term research agenda to create a paradigm shift from document-based to knowledge-based scholarly communication. Our vision is to have this work deployed in an extended version of the existing OpenResearch.org platform. We have created instances of three selected surveys on different fields of research using the SemSur ontology. We evaluated our approach involving nine researchers. As we see in the evaluation results, SemSur enables successful retrieval of relevant and accurate results without users having to spend much time and effort compared to traditional ways. This ontology can have a significant influence on the scientific community especially for researchers who want to create a survey article or write literature on a certain topic. The results of our evaluation show that researchers agree that the traditional way of gathering an overview on a particular research topic is cumbersome and time-consuming. Much effort is needed and important information might be easily overlooked. Collaborative integration of research metadata provided by the community supports researchers in this regard. Interviewed domain experts mentioned that it might be necessary to read and understand 30 to 100 scientific articles to get a proper level of understanding or an overview of a topic or sub-topics. A collaboration of researchers as owners of each particular research work to provide a structured and semantic representation of their research achievements can have a huge impact in making their research more accessible. A similar effort is spent on preparing survey and overview articles.

Future work

Integrating our methodology with the procedure of publishing survey articles can help to create a paradigm shift. We plan to further extend the ontology to cover other research methodologies and fields. For a more robust implementation of the proposed approach, we are planning to use and significantly expand the OpenResearch.org platform and a user-friendly SPARQL auto-generation services for accessing metadata analysis for non-expert users. More comprehensive evaluation of the services will be done after the implementation of the curation, exploration and discovery services. In addition, our intention is to develop and foster a living community around OpenResearch.org and SemSur, to extend the ontology and to ingest metadata to cover other research fields.

Approach

Positive Aspects: No data available now.

Negative Aspects: No data available now.

Limitations: No data available now.

Challenges: No data available now.

Proposes Algorithm: No data available now.

Methodology: No data available now.

Requirements: No data available now.

Limitations: No data available now.

Implementations

Download-page: No data available now.

Access API: No data available now.

Information Representation: No data available now.

Data Catalogue: {{{Catalogue}}}

Runs on OS: No data available now.

Vendor: No data available now.

Uses Framework: No data available now.

Has Documentation URL: No data available now.

Programming Language: No data available now.

Version: No data available now.

Platform: No data available now.

Toolbox: No data available now.

GUI: No

Research Problem

Subproblem of: No data available now.

RelatedProblem: No data available now.

Motivation: No data available now.

Evaluation

Experiment Setup: No data available now.

Evaluation Method : No data available now.

Hypothesis: No data available now.

Description: No data available now.

Dimensions: No data available now.

Benchmark used: No data available now.

Results: No data available now.

Access APINo data available now. +
Event in seriesTPDL +
Has BenchmarkNo data available now. +
Has ChallengesNo data available now. +
Has DataCatalouge{{{Catalogue}}} +
Has DescriptionNo data available now. +
Has DimensionsNo data available now. +
Has DocumentationURLhttp://No data available now. +
Has Downloadpagehttp://No data available now. +
Has EvaluationNo data available now. +
Has EvaluationMethodNo data available now. +
Has ExperimentSetupNo data available now. +
Has GUINo +
Has HypothesisNo data available now. +
Has ImplementationNo data available now. +
Has InfoRepresentationNo data available now. +
Has LimitationsNo data available now. +
Has NegativeAspectsNo data available now. +
Has PositiveAspectsNo data available now. +
Has RequirementsNo data available now. +
Has ResultsNo data available now. +
Has SubproblemNo data available now. +
Has VersionNo data available now. +
Has abstractDespite significant advances in technology
Despite significant advances in technology, the way how research is

done and especially communicated has not changed much. We have the vision that ultimately researchers will work on a common knowledge base comprising comprehensive descriptions of their research, thus making research contributions transparent and comparable. The current approach for structuring, systematizing and comparing research results is via survey or review articles. In this article, we describe how surveys for research fields can be represented in a semantic way, resulting in a knowledge graph that describes the individual research problems, approaches, implementations and evaluations in a structured and comparable way. We present a comprehensive ontology for capturing the content of survey articles. We discuss possible applications and present an evaluation of our approach with the retrospective, exemplary semantification of a survey. We demonstrate the utility of the resulting knowledge graph by using it to answer queries about the different research contributions covered by the survey and evaluate how well the query answers serve readers’ information needs, in comparison to having them

extract the same information from reading a survey paper.
e information from reading a survey paper. +
Has approachNo data available now. +
Has authorsSaid Fathalla +, Sahar Vahdati +, Sören Auer + and Christoph Lange +
Has conclusionIn this article, we presented SemSur, a Se
In this article, we presented SemSur, a Semantic Survey Ontology, and an approach for

creating a comprehensive knowledge graph representing research findings. We see this work as an initial step of a long-term research agenda to create a paradigm shift from document-based to knowledge-based scholarly communication. Our vision is to have this work deployed in an extended version of the existing OpenResearch.org platform. We have created instances of three selected surveys on different fields of research using the SemSur ontology. We evaluated our approach involving nine researchers. As we see in the evaluation results, SemSur enables successful retrieval of relevant and accurate results without users having to spend much time and effort compared to traditional ways. This ontology can have a significant influence on the scientific community especially for researchers who want to create a survey article or write literature on a certain topic. The results of our evaluation show that researchers agree that the traditional way of gathering an overview on a particular research topic is cumbersome and time-consuming. Much effort is needed and important information might be easily overlooked. Collaborative integration of research metadata provided by the community supports researchers in this regard. Interviewed domain experts mentioned that it might be necessary to read and understand 30 to 100 scientific articles to get a proper level of understanding or an overview of a topic or sub-topics. A collaboration of researchers as owners of each particular research work to provide a structured and semantic representation of their research achievements can have a huge impact in making their research

more accessible. A similar effort is spent on preparing survey and overview articles.
on preparing survey and overview articles. +
Has future workIntegrating our methodology with the proce
Integrating our methodology with the procedure of publishing survey articles can

help to create a paradigm shift. We plan to further extend the ontology to cover other research methodologies and fields. For a more robust implementation of the proposed approach, we are planning to use and significantly expand the OpenResearch.org platform and a user-friendly SPARQL auto-generation services for accessing metadata analysis for non-expert users. More comprehensive evaluation of the services will be done after the implementation of the curation, exploration and discovery services. In addition, our intention is to develop and foster a living community around OpenResearch.org and

SemSur, to extend the ontology and to ingest metadata to cover other research fields.
t metadata to cover other research fields. +
Has keywordsSemantic Metadata Enrichment, Quality Assessment, Recommendation Services, Scholarly Communication, Semantic Publishing +
Has motivationNo data available now. +
Has platformNo data available now. +
Has problemNo data available now. +
Has relatedProblemNo data available now. +
Has vendorNo data available now. +
Has year2017 +
ImplementedIn ProgLangNo data available now. +
Proposes AlgorithmNo data available now. +
RunsOn OSNo data available now. +
TitleTowards a Knowledge Graph Representing Research Findings by Semantifying Survey Articles +
Uses FrameworkNo data available now. +
Uses MethodologyNo data available now. +
Uses ToolboxNo data available now. +