Edit Paper: Querying over Federated SPARQL Endpoints : A State of the Art Survey

Jump to: navigation, search

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.


Querying over Federated SPARQL Endpoints : A State of the Art Survey

Abstract[edit]

[[has abstract:={{{Abstract}}}]]

Conclusion[edit]

[[has conclusion:={{{Conclusion}}}]]

Future work[edit]

[[has future work:={{{Future work}}}]]

Approach[edit]

Positive Aspects: [[Has PositiveAspects::{{{PositiveAspects}}}]]

Negative Aspects: [[Has NegativeAspects::{{{NegativeAspects}}}]]

Limitations: [[Has Limitations::{{{Limitations}}}]]

Challenges: [[Has Challenges::{{{Challenges}}}]]

Proposes Algorithm: [[Proposes Algorithm::{{{ProposesAlgorithm}}}]]

Methodology: [[uses Methodology::{{{Methodology}}}]]

Requirements: [[Has Requirements::{{{Requirements}}}]]

Limitations: [[Has Limitations::{{{Limitations}}}]]

Implementations[edit]

Download-page: [[Has Downloadpage::{{{Download-page}}}]]

Access API: [[access API::{{{API}}}]]

Information Representation: [[Has InfoRepresentation::{{{InfoRepresentation}}}]]

Data Catalogue: [[Has DataCatalouge::{{{Catalogue}}}]]

Runs on OS: [[ runsOn OS::{{{OS}}}]]

Vendor: [[Has vendor::{{{vendor}}}]]

Uses Framework: [[Uses Framework::{{{Framework}}}]]

Has Documentation URL: [[Has DocumentationURL::{{{DocumentationURL}}}]]

Programming Language: [[implementedIn ProgLang::{{{ProgLang}}}]]

Version: [[has Version ::{{{Version}}}]]

Platform: [[has platform::{{{Platform}}}]]

Toolbox: [[uses Toolbox::{{{Toolbox}}}]]

GUI: has GUI::No

Research Problem[edit]

Subproblem of: [[Has Subproblem::{{{Subproblem}}}]]

RelatedProblem: [[Has relatedProblem::{{{RelatedProblem}}}]]

Motivation: [[Has motivation::{{{Motivation}}}]]

Evaluation[edit]

Experiment Setup: [[Has ExperimentSetup::{{{ExperimentSetup}}}]]

Evaluation Method : [[Has EvaluationMethod::{{{EvaluationMethod}}}]]

Hypothesis: [[Has Hypothesis::{{{Hypothesis}}}]]

Description: [[Has Description::{{{Description}}}]]

Dimensions: [[Has Dimensions::{{{Dimensions}}}]]

Benchmark used: [[has Benchmark::{{{Benchmark}}}]]

Results: [[Has Results::{{{Results}}}]]


[edit]
Paper Title*: Full title of the given paper
Subject: Primary subject or topic of research of the paper.
Author(s):
Publication venue: Publication venue of the paper.
Year: The year in which the paper is published.
Keywords:
Abstract: Abstract of the paper.
Conclusion:
Future work: Future ideas of the paper.
Problem: The research problem.
Approach: Approach used to achieve the goal.
Implementation: The implementation/framework that is invoked when running.
Evaluation: Proposed work Evaluation.
Positive Aspects:
Negative Aspects:
Limitations:
Challenges:
Proposes Algorithm:
Proposes Model:
Methodology:
Requirements:
Download-page:
Access API:
Information Representation:
Data Catalogue:
OS:
Vendor: Organization: commercial, free or otherwise
Uses Framework: Framework name
Documentation URL: Link to Documentation webpage.
Programming Language:
Version:
Platform:
Toolbox:
GUI: whether the implementation has a GUI?
Subproblem of: A broader research problem.
Related Problem: A another research problem.
Motivation: The motivation to solve the problem.


Experiment setup:
Evaluation method : A broader research problem.
Hypothesis: A another research problem.
Description: The motivation to solve the problem.
Dimensions:
Select evaluation dimension.
Benchmark: Benchmark used for evaluation.
Results:



Paper description:

Cancel

Access API{{{API}}} +
Event in seriesArXiv +
Has Challenges{{{Challenges}}} +
Has DataCatalouge{{{Catalogue}}} +
Has Description{{{Description}}} +
Has Dimensions{{{Dimensions}}} +
Has DocumentationURLhttp://{{{DocumentationURL}}} +
Has Downloadpagehttp://{{{Download-page}}} +
Has EvaluationMethod{{{EvaluationMethod}}} +
Has ExperimentSetup{{{ExperimentSetup}}} +
Has GUINo +
Has Hypothesis{{{Hypothesis}}} +
Has InfoRepresentation{{{InfoRepresentation}}} +
Has Limitations{{{Limitations}}} +
Has NegativeAspects{{{NegativeAspects}}} +
Has PositiveAspects{{{PositiveAspects}}} +
Has Requirements{{{Requirements}}} +
Has Results{{{Results}}} +
Has Version{{{Version}}} +
Has abstractThe increasing amount of Linked Data and i …
The increasing amount of Linked Data and its inherent distributed nature have attracted significant attention throughout the research community and amongst practitioners to search data, in the past years. Inspired by research results from traditional distributed databases, different approaches for managing federation over SPARQL Endpoints have been introduced. SPARQL is the standardised query language for RDF, the default data model used in Linked Data deployments and SPARQL Endpoints are a popular access mechanism provided by many Linked Open Data (LOD) repositories. In this paper, we initially give an overview of the federation framework infrastructure and then proceed with a comparison of existing SPARQL federation frameworks. Finally, we highlight shortcomings in existing frameworks, which we hope helps spawning new research directions.
pe helps spawning new research directions. +
Has authorsNur Aini Rakhmawati +, J. Umbrich +, Marcel Karnstedt +, Ali Hasnain + and Michael Hausenblas +
Has conclusionFederation query over SPARQL Endpoints mad …
Federation query over SPARQL Endpoints made a significant progress in the recent years. Although

a number of federation frameworks have already been developed, the field is still relatively far from maturity. Based on our experience with the existing federation frameworks, the frameworks mostly

focus on source selection and join optimization during query execution. In this work, we have presented a list of federation frameworks over SPARQL Endpoints along with their features. According to this list, the user can have considerations to choose the suitable federation framework for their case. We have classied those framework into three categories: i) framework interprets SPARQL 1.1 query to execute federation SPARQL query covering VALUES and SERVICE operator; ii) framework handles SPARQL 1.0 query and has responsibility to find relevant source for a query and join incoming result from SPARQL Endpoints; and iii) framework accepts SPARQL 1.0 and translate the incoming query to SPARQL 1.1 format. Based on the current generation of federation frameworks surveyed in this paper, it still requires further improvements to make frameworks more effective in a broader range of applications. We suggested several features that could be included in the future developments. Finally, we point out challenges for future research directions.
challenges for future research directions. +
Has future work{{{Future work}}} +
Has keywordsFederation, SPARQL, RDF, Linked Data. +
Has motivation{{{Motivation}}} +
Has platform{{{Platform}}} +
Has subjectQuerying Distributed RDF Data Sources +
Has vendor{{{vendor}}} +
Has year2013 +
Proposes Algorithm{{{ProposesAlgorithm}}} +
TitleQuerying over Federated SPARQL Endpoints : A State of the Art Survey +
Uses Framework{{{Framework}}} +
Uses Methodology{{{Methodology}}} +
Uses Toolbox{{{Toolbox}}} +