Page values for "Bringing Relational Databases into the Semantic Web: A Survey"
Access API | No data available now. + |
Event in series | Semantic Web + |
Has Benchmark | No data available now. + |
Has Challenges | No data available now. + |
Has DataCatalouge | {{{Catalogue}}} + |
Has Description | No data available now. + |
Has Dimensions | No data available now. + |
Has DocumentationURL | http://No data available now. + |
Has Downloadpage | http://No data available now. + |
Has Evaluation | No data available now. + |
Has EvaluationMethod | No data available now. + |
Has ExperimentSetup | No data available now. + |
Has GUI | No + |
Has Hypothesis | No data available now. + |
Has Implementation | No data available now. + |
Has InfoRepresentation | No data available now. + |
Has Limitations | No data available now. + |
Has NegativeAspects | No data available now. + |
Has PositiveAspects | No data available now. + |
Has Requirements | No data available now. + |
Has Results | No data available now. + |
Has Subproblem | No data available now. + |
Has Version | No data available now. + |
Has abstract | Relational databases are considered one of … Relational databases are considered one of the most popular storage solutions for various kinds of data and they have been recognized as a key factor in generating huge amounts of data for Semantic Web applications. Ontologies, on the other hand, are one of the key concepts and main vehicle of knowledge in the Semantic Web research area. The problem of bridging the gap between relational databases and ontologies has attracted the interest of the Semantic Web community, even from the early years of its existence and is commonly referred to as the database-to-ontology mapping problem. However, this term has been used interchangeably for referring to two distinct problems: namely, the creation of an ontology from an existing database instance and the discovery of mappings between an existing database instance and an existing ontology. In this paper, we clearly define
these two problems and present the motivation, benefits, challenges and solutions for each one of them. We attempt to gather the most notable approaches proposed so far in the literature, present them concisely in tabular format and group them under a classification scheme. We finally explore the perspectives and future research steps for a seamless and meaningful integration of databases into the Semantic Web. ration of databases into the Semantic Web. + |
Has approach | No data available now. + |
Has authors | Dimitrios-Emmanuel Spanos +, Periklis Stavrou + and Nikolas Mitrou + |
Has conclusion | In this paper, we tried to present the wea … In this paper, we tried to present the wealth of research work marrying the worlds of relational databases and Semantic Web. We illustrated the variety of different approaches and identified the main challenges that researchers of this field face as well as proposed
solutions. field face as well as proposed
solutions. + |
Has keywords | Relational Database, Ontology, Mapping, OWL, Survey + |
Has motivation | No data available now. + |
Has platform | No data available now. + |
Has problem | No data available now. + |
Has relatedProblem | No data available now. + |
Has vendor | No data available now. + |
Has year | 2012 + |
ImplementedIn ProgLang | No data available now. + |
Proposes Algorithm | No data available now. + |
RunsOn OS | No data available now. + |
Title | Bringing Relational Databases into the Semantic Web: A Survey + |
Uses Framework | No data available now. + |
Uses Methodology | No data available now. + |
Uses Toolbox | No data available now. + |