Information for "Relational.OWL - A Data and Schema Representation Format Based on OWL"
Basic information
Display title | Relational.OWL - A Data and Schema Representation Format Based on OWL |
Default sort key | Relational.OWL - A Data and Schema Representation Format Based on OWL |
Page length (in bytes) | 3,887 |
Page ID | 36182 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Page protection
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Edit history
Page creator | Said (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 12:43, 28 June 2018 |
Latest editor | Said (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 14:18, 5 July 2018 |
Total number of edits | 2 |
Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
Transcluded templates (4) | Templates used on this page: |
Access API | No data available now. + |
Event in series | PAKDD + |
Has Benchmark | No data available now. + |
Has Challenges | No data available now. + |
Has DataCatalouge | {{{Catalogue}}} + |
Has Description | No data available now. + |
Has Dimensions | No data available now. + |
Has DocumentationURL | http://No data available now. + |
Has Downloadpage | https://github.com/berezovskyi/relational-owl + |
Has Evaluation | No data available now. + |
Has EvaluationMethod | No data available now. + |
Has ExperimentSetup | No data available now. + |
Has GUI | Yes + |
Has Hypothesis | No data available now. + |
Has Implementation | Relational.OWL + |
Has InfoRepresentation | No data available now. + |
Has Limitations | No data available now. + |
Has NegativeAspects | No data available now. + |
Has PositiveAspects | No data available now. + |
Has Requirements | No data available now. + |
Has Results | No data available now. + |
Has Subproblem | No data available now. + |
Has Version | No data available now. + |
Has abstract | One of the research fields which has recen … One of the research fields which has recently gained much scientific interest within the database community are Peer-to-Peer databases, where peers have the autonomy to decide whether to join or to leave an information sharing environment at any time. Such
ata and schema exchange format explicitly. +volatile data nodes may appear shortly, collect or deliver some data, and disappear again. It even can not be assured that a peer joins the network ever again. In this paper we introduce a representation format fort both, schema and data information based on the Web Ontology Language OWL. According to the advantages of the Semantic Web we are thus able to represent and to transfer every schema and data component of a database to any partner, without having to define a data and schema exchange format explicitly. |
Has approach | No data available now. + |
Has authors | Cristian Pérez de Laborda + and Stefan Conrad + |
Has conclusion | In this paper we have shown how to represe … In this paper we have shown how to represent schema and data items originally stored in relational database systems using our own OWL ontology. Relational.OWL enables us to semantically represent the schema of any relational database. This representation itself can be interpreted, due to the properties of OWL Full, as a novel ontology. Based on the latter
ore common X.500 or LDAP Directory Systems +ontology, we can now semantically represent the data stored in this specific database. The advantage of this representation technique is obvious: Both, schema and data changes can automatically be transferred to and processed by any remote database system, which is able to understand knowledge representation techniques used within OWL. Misunderstandings are impossible.Besides the refinement and completion of the concrete schema representation, we consider on how to adopt our technique to other types of database systems. Similar solutions can easily be found for Object-Oriented Databases, Hierarchical Databases like IMS, or its hybrid the modern and more common X.500 or LDAP Directory Systems |
Has future work | A further extension for Relational.OWL cou … A further extension for Relational.OWL could be a corresponding protocol extending the possibilities of Relational.OWL to particularly support data exchanges or replications. There we could employ the advantages of our knowledge representation technique for recurring problems occurring within such a data exchange process, e.g. identifying the same data items on remote databases.
Although autonomously communicating databases in a metadata exchange are still more vision than reality, our model takes us one step further. lity, our model takes us one step further. + |
Has keywords | Data Representation, Schema Representation, Semantic Web, Web Ontology Language (OWL), Resource Description Framework (RDF), Relational Databases, Ontologies + |
Has motivation | No data available now. + |
Has platform | No data available now. + |
Has problem | Transforming Relational Databases into Semantic Web + |
Has relatedProblem | No data available now. + |
Has vendor | Open Source + |
Has year | 2005 + |
ImplementedIn ProgLang | Java + |
Proposes Algorithm | No data available now. + |
RunsOn OS | No data available now. + |
Title | Relational.OWL - A Data and Schema Representation Format Based on OWL + |
Uses Framework | No data available now. + |
Uses Methodology | No data available now. + |
Uses Toolbox | No data available now. + |