L@S 2017: Difference between revisions
Heike.Rohde (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Heike.Rohde (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|Submitted papers=105 | |Submitted papers=105 | ||
|Accepted papers=14 | |Accepted papers=14 | ||
|has Proceedings Link=https://dl.acm.org/doi/proceedings/10.1145/3051457 | |||
}} | }} | ||
All papers were | All papers were | ||
| Line 24: | Line 25: | ||
offering pointers to future directions. As may be clear from the following analytics, the conference | offering pointers to future directions. As may be clear from the following analytics, the conference | ||
is highly selective in the work it accepts. | is highly selective in the work it accepts. | ||
Full Papers: submitted 105, accepted 14 | |||
Work in Process & Demos: submitted 79 accepted 35 | |||
Accepted as Posters 17 | Accepted as Posters 17 | ||
Acceptance Rate 13% 44% | Acceptance Rate 13% 44% | ||
Latest revision as of 17:19, 26 May 2020
| L@S 2017 | |
|---|---|
L@S 2017 : L@S 2017: Fourth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale
| |
| Event in series | L@S |
| Dates | 2017/04/20 (iCal) - 2017/04/21 |
| Homepage: | learningatscale.acm.org/las2017/ |
| Location | |
| Location: | Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA |
| Important dates | |
| Submissions: | 2016/10/25 |
| Notification: | 2016/12/14 |
| Papers: | Submitted 105 / Accepted 14 (13.3 %) |
| Table of Contents | |
All papers were
reviewed according to stringent criteria. Full Papers were reviewed by at least three program
committee members, Work-In-Progress Papers and Demonstration Descriptions by two. Final
decisions for acceptance of Full Papers were made by the program committee as a whole, often after
extensive discussion of the merits of the paper. Whereas Full Papers present work that is innovative
and mature, WiPs and Demos offer a forum for the newest and emerging work at earlier stages,
offering pointers to future directions. As may be clear from the following analytics, the conference
is highly selective in the work it accepts.
Full Papers: submitted 105, accepted 14
Work in Process & Demos: submitted 79 accepted 35
Accepted as Posters 17
Acceptance Rate 13% 44%